• From the EADOC
    Blog

    Printing And
    Paper Pushing: Fuel To The Fire Of Inefficiency In Construction
    The construction
    industry is one of few industries that hasn’t experienced significant
    productivity gains in the last decade. In fact, construction productivity is
    actually on the
    decline according to the National Institute of Standards
    and Technology (NIST), to the tune of a whopping
    $19.2 billion in efficiency losses per year.
    Why? A lack of
    technology adoption and inefficient hard-copy paper pushing is among the top 3
    contributors. Thankfully, the cost of lagging technology is probably the easiest
    to reclaim. We are all concerned with project cost, but in a manner of
    speaking, our budgets are consistently being busted by that rotund machine in
    the corner. It’s not the cost of the machine, paper or ink that will sink our
    budgets, but the labor inefficiencies that it fuels. Remove that fuel from the
    job site and watch bottom lines improve.
    Read the rest of this blog post by clicking on
    this link:

    0
    0
    1
    194
    1107
    Proactive Management
    9
    2
    1299
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • Enough said.  See for yourself:

    0
    0
    1
    38
    219
    Proactive Management
    1
    1
    256
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • Inside the most recent AECBytes newsletter,
    Dr. Khemiani profiles Kenesto.
    Lachmi Khemlani
    is founder and editor of AECbytes. She has a Ph.D. in Architecture from
    UC Berkeley, specializing in intelligent building modeling, and consults and writes on AEC
    technology. She can be reached at lachmi@aecbytes.com.
    Here’s her lead-in to the profile of
    Kenesto’s cloud-based project collaboration and workflow management solution
    for firms in the A/E/C Industry:
    Project Collaboration and Review
    “I recently came across a new cloud-based project collaboration and
    workflow management solution
    , Kenesto,
    that helps companies organize, manage and collaborate around their project
    information, including files, tasks, business processes, and other related
    data. It is intended to serve several different industries, of which the AEC
    industry is a key one. Given that there are so many collaboration solutions and
    platforms already available for the AEC industry, what makes Kenesto different is the way it uses
    the cloud to enable companies to work and collaborate in new and more effective
    ways across their teams, enterprises and value chains.”
    To read the rest of her comments about Kenesto’s solution, click on this link, then scroll down in the newsletter
    until you reach the words, “Project Collaboration and Review”:
    You can read more about Kenesto’s solution
    for A/E/C firms by clicking on this link:

    0
    0
    1
    253
    1446
    Proactive Management
    12
    3
    1696
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • Certainly “off-topic” from reprographics, but, nevertheless, since I spend time following financial markets, I’d like to share this article – and my comments – with those of you who also follow the financial markets and have funds invested in the stock market.  Every Monday, I read Dr. John Hussman’s “Weekly Market Commentary”; Mr. Hussman (head of the Hussman Funds) is a financial analyst who, for the past year, perhaps longer than that, has been predicting that the stock market bubble will burst, leading, quite possibly to more than a 50% correction.  His arguments are compelling, but, having said that, all of you are well aware that, despite his doomsday predictions, the market has surged onward and upward.  Well, there’s an “up and down” to everything – real estate prices rise, rise, rise…. then fall, fall, fall, then turnaround and rise again (and, at some point down the road, will fall again and rise again.)  And, the stock market is no different.  Most financial analysts are in the camp that says there’s no sign that the stock market will correct anytime soon.  Of course, their industry is only healthy (and salaries, commissions and bonuses large) when people are actively investing (not selling), so, I kind of think there’s always some self-interest involved when I read their comments, outlooks and predictions.  The point being – and this pertains to those of you who are heavily invested in the stock market – and, at some point, plan to use that money to get through your retirement years – at what point do you take your chips off the table?  


    The Fed Reserve has artificially kept interest rates (the prime benchmark rate) close to zero for several years by now.  Financial institutions (banks, etc) take advantage of that by borrowing (at near zero interest cost) and then lending that money at a profit.  Not hard to make a profit, huh.  Think about how profitable your reprographics business would be if you had near zero cost for paper, toner, labor and equipment.  But, the Fed’s policy has also driven interest rates so low that no one (who has money to invest) can make any money on funds invested in savings accounts, CD’s or treasuries.  And, because of that, most people who would normally have savings in safer investments have been “reaching for yield,” buying stocks that pay dividends, and, as demand for dividend paying stocks increased, prices of those stocks have risen.  And, as prices of dividend paying stocks have risen, so have the prices of non-dividend paying stocks risen.  They rise together.  And, for the most part, when a correction happens, they fall together as well.  The Fed’s policy has, in my opinion, created another bubble.  A bubble that will eventually burst.  The question is not “will it burst”, but “when will it burst.”  And, when it does burst, I’m thinking that you don’t want to be heavily invested in the stock market when that happens.  

    Many people in the business of promoting investing in the stock market (and many financial analysts as well) “say that” it’s stupid to try and “time the market”, that the better plan is to “buy and hold for the long-term” for even if the market corrects (i.e., goes down) it will eventually come back.  Like I said earlier, it’s almost a given that the market will go down and then go back up.  The market has always done that.  But, if you expect the market to correct – and to correct in a big negative way – what the heck would be wrong with taking your chips off the table now, then buying back in when the market is much lower than it now is?  Why “hold” when you expect a serious market correction.  What am I missing?  

    “Fisher warns Fed’s bond buying could be distorting U.S. financial markets”

    MEXICO CITY Wed Mar 5, 2014 9:52pm EST


    (Reuters) – A U.S. Federal Reserve policymaker who has long criticized its bond-buying stimulus said on Wednesday the program has lasted too long, and there are signs it is now distorting financial markets and encouraging risk-taking.
    In a speech in Mexico City, Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher amplified some lingering concerns that the central bank’s policy stimulus is stoking asset-price bubbles that “may result in tears” for investors acting on bad incentives.
    “There are increasing signs quantitative easing has overstayed its welcome: Market distortions and acting on bad incentives are becoming more pervasive,” he said of the asset purchases, which are sometimes called QE.
    “I fear that we are feeding imbalances similar to those that played a role in the run-up to the financial crisis,” he said in prepared remarks to the Association of Mexican Banks.
    Fisher, a voter on U.S. monetary policy this year, also praised Mexico’s moves to stimulate growth in the wake of the global recession. As for the United States, he repeated criticisms that the government has failed to take advantage of the five years of easy Fed money, missing its opportunity to restructure debt and to reform entitlements and regulations.
    The central bank has kept interest rates near zero since late 2008 and has bought more than $3 trillion in Treasury and mortgage-based bonds to lower longer-term borrowing costs, and stimulate hiring and growth.
    The U.S. economy expanded at a decent 2.4 percent rate in the fourth quarter but has slowed this year thanks in part to severe winter weather.
    “I do think we have had some short-term weather impact but that can turn around very quickly,” Fisher said, adding that warmer temperatures would boost consumption and industry.
    Though the Fed under new Chair Janet Yellen has taken the first few steps to trim its bond buying, which now runs at $65-billion per month, worries are growing that all the stimulus has driven investors to take risks that could destabilize financial markets.
    Fisher, an outspoken policy hawk, pointed to soaring margin debt and the narrow spreads between corporate and Treasury debt as areas of concern.
    In the stock markets, he said price-to-projected-earnings, price-to-sales ratios, and market capitalization relative to GDP are all at “eye-popping levels not seen since the dot-com boom” of the late 1990s.
    “We must monitor these indicators very carefully so as to ensure that the ghost of ‘irrational exuberance’ does not haunt us again,” he said, borrowing former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan’s line warning about the tech-asset bubble.
    For now, the Fed is in no rush to raise rates and is only gradually trimming the bond purchases, which over the past few years have swelled its balance sheet to more than $4 trillion.
    Fisher said that while the Fed has no “clear plan” for draining some of the $2.5 trillion in reserves that have built up at banks, he was confident the Fed would find a “practicable” way to normalize its balance sheet and avoid inflation.
    “The real tools that we are focusing on are how we manage the exit from the current hyper-accommodative monetary policy and how do we make sure … that we do it in a way that doesn’t allow the current very large and presently non-inflationary monetary base … from becoming inflationary,” he said following his speech.

    (Reporting by Alexandra Alper; Writing by Jonathan Spicer; Editing by Diane Craft andEric Walsh)
  • It seems like Textura issues a press release
    every time it makes a sale.
    Does anyone happen to know the amount of
    revenue Textura generates when it makes “a sale” like the one announced
    below?  If so, please let me know!
    PRESS RELEASE
    March 17, 2014, 7:30 a.m. EDT
    GFI
    Development Company Adopts Submittal Exchange on Iconic Five Beekman Street Project;
    Design and Construction Streamlined on Historic Landmark Hotel in NYC.
    DES MOINES, Iowa, March 17, 2014
    /PRNewswire/ —  Textura® Corporation TXTR
    +3.94% , the leading
    provider of collaboration solutions for the construction industry, announced
    today that GFI
    Development Company
    is using Submittal
    Exchange
    ® to manage design and construction communications for the
    elaborate renovation of the unique Five Beekman Street project in Manhattan’s
    Financial District. 
    “One of our General Contractor
    partners showed us Submittal Exchange on another project and we knew it was
    exactly the solution we needed to manage the massive amount of design and
    construction information for our Five Beekman Street project,” said Kim Savarese,
    Project Manager, GFI Development. “Using Submittal Exchange will allow us
    to simplify the design process and move right into construction at a quicker
    pace. Having documents in an automated workflow and readily available in one
    location for the project team during each phase of the project is very
    helpful.” 
    GFI Development Company is using
    both of Textura’s Submittal Exchange web-based collaboration solutions on the
    Five Beekman Street project. Submittal Exchange for Design improves efficiency
    and communication during the design phase of a project.  Submittal
    Exchange for Construction allows project teams to electronically exchange,
    review and archive construction submittals, RFI’s and other communications on
    the construction phases of a project.  With these solutions GFI
    Development Company is able to streamline the management of documents and
    communications to eliminate frustrations, delays and unexpected costs.
    GFI Development Company and GB
    Lodging, LLC are converting the notable Five Beekman Street building into a
    luxury hotel consisting of approximately 287 guest rooms and over 68
    residential units that will be operated by Commune Hotels. The historic
    structure together with an adjacent site on Nassau Street will total
    approximately 340,000 square feet, including a 46-story tower.

    0
    0
    1
    443
    2531
    Proactive Management
    21
    5
    2969
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    “We are very pleased that GFI
    Development Company has selected Submittal Exchange for their impressive
    renovation project,” said Patrick Allin, Chairman and Chief Executive
    Office, Textura Corporation. “Using Submittal Exchange will help the
    project move seamlessly through design and successful construction to produce a
    stunning historic renovation the city will treasure.”
  • 0
    0
    1
    13
    75
    Proactive Management
    1
    1
    87
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • 0
    0
    1
    705
    4020
    Proactive Management
    33
    9
    4716
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    ROWE, a German
    manufacturer of large-format printers, scanners, and other equipment, is
    entering the U.S. market in partnership with The Heavey Group.
    Information
    about Rowe’s entry into the U.S. market appeared yesterday on IRgA
    Today
    (Ed Avis is doing a fantastic job
    of finding news of relevance to the reprographics community!)
    When I read
    about this on IRgA Today, my very first thought was, “wow, big balls.”  A small company, The Heavey Group, is going
    to go head-to-head with OCE and KIP. 
    (Note: I still think of OCE as
    OCE and not as Canon; some old habits are hard to break.)
    But, as that
    old saying goes, “nothing ventured,
    nothing gained
    .”  Good luck to The
    Heavey Group team on their launch of Rowe in the U.S.  While I hate to criticize anyone, I do think
    they’ve made a slight marketing faux-pas – – I think they should have called
    the new U.S. business – ROWE USA.
    Evidently, the CEO of The Heavey Group is
    well experienced, having previously worked with both OCE and Xerox.
    Bob began his sales career during his college years working for
    his father’s real estate firm, JB Heavey & Co.  Upon graduating, Bob
    landed a sales position working for a major oil company, Atlantic
    Richfield.  Bob entered the engineering print industry and has over 26
    years of experience working as a Major Account Representative and a Dealer
    Channel Manager.  The majority of his career was spent working for Oce and
    Xerox Engineering Systems.”
    This
    morning, I e-mailed one of my ex-partners, from years ago, to ask him if “this
    Rowe” is the same Rowe that entered the U.S. diazo-equipment market back in the
    mid 1980’s.  Back then, a high-quality, German
    diazo-equipment manufacturer, and I think the name of that company was Rowe,
    but it could have been “Ruwe”, a different company from “Rowe”, entered the
    U.S. market with Budden Graphics, a well respected U.S. distributor / dealer of
    engineering photographics equipment and supplies.  I don’t recall what happened with Budden’s
    Rowe (or Ruwe) business.  I do know that
    Budden Graphics is no longer in business. 
    (Note:  Richard Budden, the CEO and owner, is, today,
    one of the top Realtors in the U.S.)
      My
    ex-partner said his memory is “rusty”; he doesn’t recall the brand-name of the
    equipment Budden Graphics was distributing. 
    (If his memory is rustY, mine is rustED!)
    Rowe is not
    an unknown.  Many of us who’ve attended
    IRgA Conventions in the past, have seen Rowe equipment before.  A bit more than two years ago, interested at
    the time in knowing more about Rowe and knowing that Rowe had a distributor in
    India, I sent the following e-mail to Rowe in Germany:
    From: joel salus
    Subject: ROWE equipment in the U.S.?
    Date: January 26, 2012 1:30:24 PM EST
    To: sandra.ruiz@rowe.de
    Hello Sandra,
    I’d like to know if Rowe sells (its large-format
    multifunction and printer-only) equipment into the U.S.A market.
    I found a company that sells Rowe equipment in India, but I
    have not yet found one that sells Rowe equipment in the U.S.A.
    Please advise.
    I did not
    receive a response from Rowe (at least I
    don’t recall
    receiving a response.)
    At the same
    time I sent that e-mail, I sent an e-mail to a friend who is the Managing
    Director of the largest reprographics enterprise in Central / Eastern Europe –
    to ask him what he knew about Rowe.  His
    response:
    Joel,
    I am afraid I will not be much help here. I have never
    heard of Rowe and neither did Jakub. I am also not aware of anyone else using
    this equipment, but that probably means nothing else other than me being uninformed.
    Anyway, if I find anything out, I will let you know.
    Regards,
    Roman
    One
    remarkable point I should mention.  My
    friend Roman’s company is based in The Czech Republic. Those of you who are not
    geographically-challenged know that the CZR is
    right next door to
    Germany.  If Roman
    was not aware of Rowe, that means that Rowe must do a lousy job of marketing its company and products,
    for how could an extraordinarily smart, savvy guy like Roman not know about Rowe?
    Which leads
    me to “highly suggest” to The Heavey Group team that it take steps to create a pervasive, high-profile marketing program
    to “introduce” the Rowe brand and line of equipment to the U.S. market.  I’m certain that Bob Heavey does not want
    Rowe to end up being “the best kept secret.”
    Competition
    among large-format equipment manufacturers is good for U.S. reprographers (and
    good for reprographers wherever they are in the world.)  Again, best of luck to Bob Heavey and his
    team!

    Here’s a link to the article on IRgA Today about Rowe:

    0
    0
    1
    31
    183
    Proactive Management
    1
    1
    213
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • Yesterday, I posted an article – that
    appeared in PrintWeek, on February 14th
    – about SP UK being up for sale.  Last
    night, I received an e-mail from a SP UK team member indicating that a further
    article had appeared in PrintWeek on
    March 7th.   That further
    article appears below. 
    But, first, a few comments:
    First, I’d like to thank the SP UK team member who
    directed me to this article for taking the time to do so.  In his/her e-mail, he/she said,
    I haven’t seen
    the full report, so not sure if headline is out of context, but it’s the most
    negative thing I’ve seen so far.  Quotes from within the article don’t
    seem to refute the general tone of the piece either. Up until this article, the
    official line has been ‘business as usual’.  I’m not sure if this appeared
    in the print version or just online, but it’s likely to raise the interest of
    customers, suppliers and rivals alike, and not in a positive way.”
    Second, in the article below, you’ll note that PrintWeek speculates that The Color
    Company (TCC), the same company that purchased SP USA, will likely be the
    purchaser of SP UK.  To me, that would be
    an extraordinary turn of events.  If TCC
    is the eventual purchaser of SP UK, it will be every interesting to see if
    TCC’s Mr. Robert Feld plays the same role with regard to SP UK’s business that
    he’s evidently playing with regard to TCC’s acquisition of SP USA’s
    business.  Mr. Feld’s very interesting, quite colorful
    background has been well written about in the UK.  That’s not the case here in the U.S., where
    most of SP USA’s customers have ‘no clue’ as to the very colorful nature of Mr.
    Feld’s background.
    Third, although
    the article did not state SP UK’s sales for 2013, it did state SP UK’s sales
    for 2012 and 2011.  At its 2012 sales –
    £40.4m (which is approximately $66 million USD at the current exchange
    rate)
    – SP UK is
    the largest reprographics business in the U.K. and one of the top five
    reprographics businesses in the world.  SP
    UK has long been one of the most highly respected reprographics businesses on
    planet Earth. 
    Okay, here’s the additional story that
    appeared in PrintWeek on March 7th.
    “”Service Point UK report reveals
    “significant limitation””
    By Jo Francis,
    Friday 07 March 2014, writing for PrintWeek
    Up-for-sale
    Service Point UK has filed its overdue financial statements for 2012, with the
    directors admitting a “significant limitation” on the period over which the
    directors are able to consider the going concern status of the company, due to
    events at its parent company.
    Resolution to
    Service Point UK situation anticipated this month
    The firm’s
    parent
    GPP Capital PLC is
    in administration
    and ultimate parent company Service Point Solutions in Spain has sought
    creditor protection.
    Service Point UK
    provides reprographics and print management services via a nationwide branch
    network. It employs around 550 staff. Lloyds Bank has a charge over Service
    Point UK’s assets due to a cross-guarantee given by the Spanish company over
    its €71.9m (£59.5m) debt with the bank.
    The director’s
    report stated: “… hence the directors are unable to control the strategic
    future of the business or the manner in which its assets are employed. This
    fact in itself imposes a significant limitation on the period over which the
    directors are able to consider the going concern status of the company.”
    GPP’s
    administrator Ernst & Young is marketing the Service Point UK business for
    sale, with any deal likely to be complicated by its pension deficit, stated as
    £9.3m in the just-filed accounts.
    Ernst &
    Young said there was no update on the sale process at present, although PrintWeek
    understands that a resolution to the situation is likely to be put in place
    this month.
    “The going
    concern issues will drive the timeline on this,” said an industry source.
    Service Point UK
    managing director Michael Barton-Harvey issued a statement, which said: “All
    parties involved are working exceptionally hard to support the best outcome
    regards the current situation.”
    Competitor The
    Color Company, which acquired the assets of Service Point’s USA operations
    after that business was closed down last year, has been tipped as a possible
    purchaser for all or part of the business. PrintWeek was unable to reach
    owner Elgin Loane for comment.
    In the year to
    31 December 2012 Service Point UK posted sales of £40.4m (2011: £44.9m).
    Although the firm said it maintained its gross margin of 39%, a nominal operating
    profit of £78,000 was wiped out by charges to the parent undertaking of
    £989,000 and a £2.2m write-off of intercompany receivables due to the impact of
    the bank calling in its debt.
    The firm also
    spent £652,000 on restructuring its operations, which included closing three
    sites and reducing headcount by 70. The bottom-line loss was £3.5m.
    However, the
    report stated that subsequent trading in 2013 has resulted in a £1m-plus
    improvement in operating profit at the firm.
    Comments on this
    article have been closed following a formal complaint.
    This is where I found this article:

    0
    0
    1
    798
    4551
    Proactive Management
    37
    10
    5339
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • Although this article – from PrintWeek, a UK-based print-industry
    publication – is somewhat dated – it appeared just over one month ago – it’s
    actually the first article I’ve found where the administrators (of GPP Capital)
    made a statement about SP UK being up for sale.
    By Jo Francis,
    Friday 14 February 2014
    The
    administrator of GPP Capital PLC, the parent company of Service Point UK, hopes
    to achieve a sale of the Service Point UK business by the spring.
    GPP Capital PLC
    was placed into administration by its banks in October, following a protracted
    series of events involving GPP’s own parent company, Spanish firm Service Point
    Solutions SA (SPS), which is listed on the Madrid and Barcelona stock exchanges.


    During 2013 SPS
    had attempted to restructure its £100m of debt, but despite shifting £25m of
    the debt into convertible bonds it continued to breach its banking covenants
    and subsequent attempts to sell the business stalled.


    SPS acquired
    financial printer Chris Fowler International in 2008
    .


    Service Point’s
    subsidiaries in the USA ceased trading (shut down) in November after the
    directors there decided there was insufficient time or funding to attempt a
    Chapter 11 or Chapter 7 process.

SPS’s shares are now suspended.  


    GPP Capital owes
    its creditors £92.8m, of which £61.3m is owed to Lloyds Bank and £31.5m to SPS
    in Spain.


    Service Point UK
    had sales of £44.9m in the year to 31 December 2011, placing it at number 50 in
    PrintWeek’s Top 500. The company posted a pre-tax loss of £623,000 for the
    year, after paying a £1.6m charge to its parent. The operating profit was
    £62,000. The firm’s 2012 accounts are overdue.


    The business has
    27 locations across the UK, with ten of those in London, and employs around 600
    staff. It provides a wide range of print, document management, and print
    management services.


    Ernst &
    Young began actively marketing GPP’s shareholding in Service Point UK at the
    start of this year, and said it was “business as usual” for the UK operation in
    the meantime.

The administrators provided PrintWeek with a statement, which
    said: “GPP, the parent company of document management and solutions firm
    Service Point UK Limited (SP UK), has confirmed that SP UK continues to trade
    on a ‘business as usual’ basis, with the ongoing support of its employees,
    customers and suppliers. 

    “GPP, via its
    advisors, is currently undertaking a marketing and sales process with a view to
    identifying a suitable purchaser of GPP’s shareholding in SP UK.”
     A number
    of both trade and private investors are understood to be interested in
    purchasing the shareholding in SP UK. GPP expects to be in receipt of
    indicative offers for SP UK shortly. Thereafter, it is expected that a limited
    number of parties will be invited to participate in a further round of due
    diligence and negotiation which is expected to conclude, with an eventual sale
    of the shareholding in SP UK, by the spring.”

However, any sale is likely to
    be complicated by Service Point UK’s defined benefit pension scheme, which has
    a deficit of at least £11.5m according to the 2011 accounts.


    A business
    restructuring expert told PrintWeek: “I’d be staggered if anyone buys the
    shares unless the price is negligible at best. Otherwise, the pension problem
    needs to be mitigated in order to get this business sold – either via a
    pre-pack, or some other method that means there will be no further obligation from
    the buyer to the pension scheme.”
    “Comments on
    this thread have been closed following a formal complaint.”
    This is where I found this article:

    0
    0
    1
    584
    3330
    Proactive Management
    27
    7
    3907
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • This is the link to the Spanish-language
    version of the report. (This is the “official” report). Here’s that link:
    When you click on the next link, doing so
    will take you to a “Google-Translate” translation of this latest document. (Please
    note – it will ask you to “download”, and what you will be downloading, if you
    click the link, is a “web-archive” document):
    As I’ve
    previously stated whenever I’ve used Google-Translate to translate SPS reports
    from Spanish to English, translations are far from perfect (and, they read kind
    of weird, to the point where it is easy – very easy – to get a headache when
    you read them!)
    Blog Publisher’s comments:

    0
    0
    1
    186
    1061
    Proactive Management
    8
    2
    1245
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    This document contains some very interesting
    information.
      If you are following
    developments at SPS, you’ll definitely want to read this document.  Interesting 
    information, such as….

    0
    0
    1
    77
    443
    Proactive Management
    3
    1
    519
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    “As mentioned in paragraph 1.1 above, the Company is
    actively working with several potential investors who have submitted
    bids to the financial institutions. The
    negotiation has slowed as a result of the beginning of a parallel
    process of sale
    subsidiaries taken
    over by the banks (in the UK, Norway and Sweden)
    , led by the GPP
    administrator Capital Plc, Ernst & Young LLP. I also understand that potential sales process and the realization of
    collateral by banks will have to be under analysis by the court in
    Spain.”