results:
the survey on November 30th and left it open until this afternoon.
the fact that the survey post received 744 page-views – and, people, that’s a huge number of page-views for a post on
Reprographics 101 – only 24 people took the time to participate in the
survey.
survey results:
has done a very thorough job getting the word out, in and around the
reprographics industry, about its PageWide wide-format printing
technology. 100% reported knowing about
HP PageWide wide-format. [Note that HP
recently showed HP PageWide at the AutoDesk event that took place in Vegas a
couple of weeks ago – first time showing PageWide at an event that end-user
customers (A/E firms) go to.]
respondents feel that HP PageWide wide-format printers will cause a serious or
moderate reduction in sales of B&W toner-based wide-format printers. My take:
if HP’s claims prove to be true, the reduction will be dramatic, not
just serious or moderate.
respondents indicating that, since HP’s PageWide announcement in June, they’ve
held back on acquisitions of new technical document wide-format systems.
around 44% of respondents have held back on acquisitions of black & white
wide-format printers. That’s totally
surprising to me, unless the acquisitions HAD to be made and could not be held
off.
respondents have held back on acquisitions of color wide-format printers. I would have guessed that this number would
be lower than the B&W number.
nearly unanimous that reprographers feel that, over time, HP’s PageWide
wide-format printers will cause a reduction in the prices reprographers get for
printing large-format technical documents in color.
substantial majority of respondents feel that both A&E firms and GC’s will
want more and technical documents (plans, drawings) printed in color if pricing
for that sort of printing goes lower.
respondents indicated that they will, or that it’s likely that they will,
acquire HP PageWide wide-format equipment.
Comment: Not sure what the 4 who said “probably not” are
thinking!!! Do they really want to be
the ones who fall behind technology-wise?
full/complete results of the Survey can be accessed at this link: (give the
file time to load, please):
0
0
1
390
2226
Proactive Management
18
5
2611
14.0
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
JA
X-NONE
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Cambria;
mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-language:JA;}
Leave a comment