If you bought 100% of SPS, it’d be like paying a purchase price of 16.34% of Sales Revenues.
If you bought 100% of ARC, it’d be like paying a purchase price of 48.94% of Sales Revenues.
I know, I know, I know … both have debt and debt is a consideration (but, I’m too lazy to look back at SPS’s debt picture.)
But, still, I can remember “the days” in the reprographics business where you could purchase reprographics companies for 50% of Sales Revenues – and sometimes for less than that. But, as time went on, some reprographics companies sold for more than 100% of Sales. There was a time when ARC, itself, was valued at more than 250% of Sales.
Referring to the table below:
I’ve used a EURO to $USD exchange rate of 1.43 to convert SPS’ numbers from Euros to US Dollars.
I’ve “annualized” both company’s 2011 Sales simply by multiplying their first half 2011 Sales by a factor of 2.
It’s interesting, I think, that SPS is, on a Market Cap as a %age of Sales basis, valued at 2/3rds less than ARC
|
($USD / mil) |
($USD / mil) |
|
|
SPS |
ARC |
|
|
Sales – first half 2011 |
$158.09 |
$216.09 |
|
multiplier (to annualize) |
2 |
2 |
|
Sales – full year 2011* |
$316.18 |
$432.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Closing share price – 08/05/11 |
$0.47 |
$4.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Market Capitalization – 08/05/11 |
$51.67 |
$211.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Market Cap as a %age of Sales |
16.34% |
48.94% |
Leave a comment