• 0
    0
    1
    422
    2407
    Proactive Management
    20
    5
    2824
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    I always
    encourage reprographers to read ARC’s financial-results-reports; they are
    informative, and one can learn from that.
     
    YOU are never too old to learn.  [And
    NONE of you are geniuses {with the exception of David Limbaugh)].
    ARC Document
    Solutions (ARC) reported Q2 2013 financial results, after the market closed on
    Tuesday, and you can access ARC’s 10-Q by visiting the investor section at
    e-arc.com. 
    I did not
    listen in on the earnings call that ARC held late Tuesday afternoon, but, on
    Wednesday morning, I did access, and read, the written transcript of the
    earnings call, which can be found at seekingalpha.com.  Listening to earnings calls (or reading the
    transcripts of earnings calls, if you don’t have time to listen to the live
    earnings calls), can also be quite informative.
    Here’s my
    very brief “takeaway” on ARC’s Q2 results:
    Sales of
    “services” in Q2 2013 were almost equal to sales of “services” in Q2 2012.  However, within the numbers, ARC’s revenues
    from “traditional reprographics” (and, revenues from “digital” services, since
    those are generally tied to revenues from “traditional reprographics” services)
    were down.  But, on the other hand, ARC’s
    revenues from its FM/MPS business segment were up.
    The A/E/C
    industry has been healthier this year than last year; more projects to print
    this year than last year; that good news probably offset somewhat by A/E/C
    customers continuing to “print less” “per project.”  Revenues from “traditional reprographics”
    services were down, but revenues from “OnSite” services were up.  As ARC continues to push FM/MPS services, it
    could well be that some customers, whose revenues were formerly counted as
    “traditional reprographics” revenues, were, at some point, “converted” to
    FM/MPS customers.
    ARC’s gross
    margin expanded 220 basis points, Q2 2013 vs. Q2 2012; and, to me, that’s a
    stunning achievement, especially since this margin expansion was not driven by
    increased sales.  As most reprographers
    know, the incremental gross margin on incremental “traditional reprographics”
    services revenues can be very, very high; my estimate of that incremental
    margin is 50-85% (depends on prices charged), so, when a company’s gross margin
    improves, and improves quite a bit, without
    the benefit of
    increased traditional reprographics services revenues, that
    means that the company has controlled (and cut) costs in a very meaningful
    way.  That’s what ARC said it was going
    to do.  And, it’s quite obvious that ARC
    has done that. 
    The
    reprographics industry is still in a recovery mode.  Yet, ARC managed to post positive EBITDA,
    EBIT and Net Income.  Take a few minutes
    to compare ARC’s EBITDA %age to Service Point Solutions’ EBITDA %age.  Interesting comparison, for sure!

  • 0
    0
    1
    265
    1513
    Proactive Management
    12
    3
    1775
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    About the survey results:
    The survey
    consisted of 29 questions.  When you open
    the survey-results file, you will first see (pages 1-15) the compiled responses
    to each question.  But, go beyond page 15, for some of the questions asked for text
    (or numerical) responses, and those responses (text responses or numerical
    responses) begin on page 16.
    Very light turnout, only 22 companies
    participated in the survey.
      Quite disappointing, and I almost decided not
    to bother publishing the survey results. 
    Was the lack
    of participation due to reprographer-apathy? 
    Was it due to this survey not being “sanctioned” by the IRgA?  Do reprographers not really care to see
    what’s going on, trend-wise, vis a vis
    their peers?  Or, perhaps RSA and
    ReproMAX have been conducting their own surveys.  (If they haven’t been doing that, that’s
    stupid.) Since 2008 (2009 for some), the industry has experienced a severe
    downturn in revenues, especially revenues related to printed plans and
    specs.  Many are still struggling to find
    ways to replace lost revenues; many don’t feel that plan and spec printing
    revenues will ever recover to what they formerly were.   However, that said, most reprographers remain
    optimistic about the future …. and that, for sure, is a good thing.
    I’d like to
    thank those companies who did participate in the survey. 
    At this
    point, it is highly unlikely that I’ll bother to do any more surveys in the
    future.  Likely that I’ll leave that to
    the IRgA.
    If you would
    like to receive the survey-results file, please send a “request” to joel.salus@mac.com
    Joel Salus,
    Publisher
    Reprographics
    101 Blog

    The
    survey-results file is copyrighted.

  • 0
    0
    1
    122
    697
    Proactive Management
    5
    1
    818
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    I
    liked this article; authored by Dan Marx, VP of the SGIA
    Commentary & Analysis
    Wide-Format Gets Bigger (Will You?)
    By Dan Marx
Published: July 31, 2013
    I’m currently in my 22nd year serving the specialty graphics
    industry. During my time with SGIA, I’ve been witness to the complete
    changeover in imaging equipment technology. Back in ’91, the “S” in SGIA stood
    for “screen” printing. Since that time, wide-format inkjet made its appearance,
    excited some and threatened others, was adopted in increasing levels as the
    years clicked by, and in time became the specialty graphics industry’s primary
    technology.
    Link to…

  • Thursday, August 01, 2013

    SAN DIEGO – The UPS Store today announced it is the first nationwide retailer to test 3-D printing services in-store. Select UPS Store locations will be offering the services to start-ups, small businesses and retail customers, beginning in the San Diego area with locations in additional cities across the United States in the near future.

    A recent poll of small business owners conducted by The UPS Store showed high interest in trying the services, particularly for those needing to create prototypes, artistic renderings or promotional materials.

    “Start-ups, entrepreneurs and small business owners may not have the capital to purchase a 3-D printer on their own, but they may have a need to show prototypes to their current and potential customers,” said Michelle Van Slyke, vice president of marketing and small business solutions at The UPS Store. “By offering 3-D printing capabilities in-center, we’re able to help further our small business customers’ opportunities for success.”

    The UPS Store is testing the Stratasys uPrint SE Plus printer, which according to Stratasys, is most well-known for its ability to print detailed objects more accurately than home 3-D printers. Stratasys notes that this is particularly important when parts need to fit into each other or fit some other object. With this printer, The UPS Store locations will be equipped to produce items like engineering parts, functional prototypes, acting props, architectural models, fixtures for cameras, lights and cables.

    In addition, The UPS Store locations offer a range of services tailored to meet the needs of small businesses in all stages of the business lifecycle. Not only can small business owners receive well-recognized services like packing and shipping, printing, faxing, direct mail and mailbox services, but The UPS Store locations also will work with business owners to develop custom solutions to meet their unique business needs.

    For more information on how The UPS Store supports small businesses, visit the Small Business Solutions portal at smallbiz.theupsstore.comOpens in a new window.

  • 0
    0
    1
    140
    801
    Proactive Management
    6
    1
    940
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    Océ PlotWave® 340/360

Black &
    White Large Format Printer / Copier / Scanner with Multi-touch Gestures
    Touchscreen and Cloud Integration
    Highlights at a glance:
    NEW! Océ
    ClearConnect 10.4″ color LCD, touchscreen interface with multi-touch
    NEW!
    Enhanced project collaboration through integrated cloud printing and scanning
    NEW!
    Intuitive preview functions help avoid expensive errors
    Single all
    in one footprint for multifunction print/copy/scan in limited workspaces
    Océ Radiant
    Fusing Technology for instant-on printing, no warm up time, tremendous
    reliability, and very low operating costs
    Integrated
    top delivery tray with Oce’s air delivery system to keep your documents neatly
    stacked and collated
    NEW! Océ
    PowerM controller designed for today’s IT environments
    Fast print
    speeds: 10 linear feet per minute with the PlotWave 340, or 13 linear feet per
    minute with the PlotWave 360

  • 0
    0
    1
    241
    1379
    Proactive Management
    11
    3
    1617
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    For immediate release:
    Washington, D.C. – July 24, 2013 – The Architecture Billings Index (ABI) remained positive again in
    June after the first decline in ten months in April. As a leading economic
    indicator of construction activity, the ABI reflects the approximate nine to
    twelve month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending.
    The American Institute of Architects (AIA)
    reported the June ABI score was 51.6, down from a mark of 52.9 in May. This
    score reflects an increase in demand for design services (any score above 50
    indicates an increase in billings).
    The new projects inquiry index was 62.6, up
    sharply from the reading of 59.1 the previous month.
    

“With steady demand for design work in all
    major nonresidential building categories, the construction sector seems to be
    stabilizing,” said AIA Chief Economist, Kermit Baker, PhD, Hon. AIA. 
    “Threats to a sustained recovery include construction costs and labor
    availability, inability to access financing for real estate projects, and
    possible adverse effects in the coming months from sequestration and the
    looming federal debt ceiling debate.”
    Key June ABI highlights:
    Regional averages: Northeast (55.6), South
    (54.8), West (51.2), Midwest (48.3)

    Sector index breakdown: commercial / industrial
    (54.7), multi-family residential (54.0), mixed practice (52.4), institutional
    (51.8)

    Project inquiries index: 62.6

    The regional and sector categories are
    calculated as a 3-month moving average, whereas the index and inquiries are
    monthly numbers.

  • 0
    0
    1
    138
    793
    Proactive Management
    6
    1
    930
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    An informational document published by Oce
    Introduction
    As technology advances at an ever increasing pace, the
    demand for GIS information, such as topo- graphic maps, population overlays and
    aerial photo- graphs increases as well. Often times this demand is in the form
    of printed output such as maps and annotated aerial imagery.
    But the print production process for these types of
    applications is often time consuming and unwieldy, which can lead to delays and
    mistakes. Now more that ever organizations that rely on printing these GIS
    related applications must ensure that they select the proper printing solution
    that maximizes productivity and reduces turnaround time while providing user-friendly
    operation.
    Link to document:

  • 0
    0
    1
    84
    485
    Proactive Management
    4
    1
    568
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    I found this
    PowerPoint Presentation when visiting/exploring “Construction Business Owner
    dot com.
    Evidently,
    this PPT file (the presentation document) was created by a firm known as
    ViewPoint Construction Software.
    Here’s a link to the presentation document:
    (Note:  it’s a 35 page file, so give it some time to
    load)

  • Article published by The Daily Journal of Commerce, Oregon

    Focus on technology: JE Dunn’s little blue kiosk

    POSTED: Thursday, March 28, 2013 at 12:28 PM PT
    BY: 

    Butch Fiedler, a senior superintendent with JE Dunn, demonstrates the use of a kiosk housing a computer which contains building plans for the OHSU/OUS Collaborative Life Sciences Building project. (Sam Tenney/DJC)

    A quick glance around the OHSU/OUS Collaborative Life Sciences Building project site in Portland’s South Waterfront District offers sights common to just about any other construction site in the city. But closer inspection reveals something that sets the JE Dunn Construction Co. project apart from those being done by other companies: a rectangular, blue, metal box on wheels on one of the upper floors.
    The doors on the box conceal an oversized computer monitor and a keyboard. With a click of a mouse, a subcontractor armed with a provided password can access the entire history of the project’s drawings, including the most recent updates.


    The JE Dunn folks call the blue box a kiosk, and the computer setup is part of a paperless job system they’ve dubbed the Dunn Dashboard. By using the now-industry-standard Bluebeam software and adding hyperlinks, the construction company has turned the work flow on the Collaborative Life Sciences Building site into the stuff of which construction writers with a passion for technology could only dream a few years ago.


    The Dunn Dashboard allows project team members, including subcontractors, to bypass traditional paper drawings and build directly off of the kiosk computer, laptops and electronic tablets. In this paperless world, PDF drawings are updated from a single, main source with the speed of a 4G network and a single click of a mouse. 


    Hyperlinks on the dashboard allow crews working on the project to move quickly through drawings for specific portions of the project.
    That means tables overloaded with stacks of papers are missing from job trailers. Gone, too, is the need for each project team member to track myriad changes to drawings. And while a traditional set of drawings can still be found on the floors of the project, the sheets are as clean as the day they were placed there. For the most part, even the most tech-phobic construction veterans seem to have embraced the Dunn Dashboard system, according to JE Dunn Vice President E.H. “Chip” Laizure.


    “It’s very intuitive; if you can operate an iPhone, you can use this,” Laizure said. “Guys in the field love it – even the old guys.”


    The idea that became the Dunn Dashboard started when JE Dunn employees were working on a job in Colorado. The changes to drawings came fast and furious, often making it difficult to keep up.


    “We were getting new documents every nine minutes,” said Eric Snelling, JE Dunn’s director of field operations in the Northwest. “By the time I would get the drawings back, I would be 40 documents behind.”
    One of the members of Snelling’s crew began creating shortcuts to allow him to move more easily between the Bluebeam drawings. Before long, the shortcuts had developed into a system of hyperlinks that eventually morphed into the full-blown Dunn Dashboard system.


    Before plunging high-dollar, highly complex projects like the South Waterfront job into a world without paper, JE Dunn tested the system on smaller projects. The success on jobs valued at around $200,000 convinced the company that the dashboard approach would perform equally well on projects valued at $200 million, Laizure said.


    Four years later, the dashboard has become the standard system for all of JE Dunn’s projects. And Bluebeam has contacted the construction company to learn more about how it took the software to another level.
    “Almost every contractor is using Bluebeam, but no one has taken it to the level we have,” Snelling said.
    Being at the head of a technology curve, especially one in an industry that has been so reliant on paper documents, isn’t always a smooth ride. Convincing subcontractors to trade paper drawings for an image on a computer screen was surprisingly easy, according to Laizure. But doing the same with project owners often takes more coaxing, especially when all they receive at the end of a project is a thumb drive with the entire history of their building’s drawings and plans.


    “It’s still hard for (building owners) to let go of paper,” Laizure said.


    But increasingly, he added, owners are seeing the benefit of having a system that lets them quickly reference a specific building portion with a single mouse click. And it’s not just because it means they don’t have to find an entire room in which to store paperwork related to the project.


    “All of the documents go to the owner once the project is done, right down to identifying the actual products used,” Snelling said. “It’s really powerful for (them). But the end users – the (building) maintenance people – are the ones who really love it.


    “We had a cooling tower maintenance guy ask us to include a hyperlink to the panel schedule (for one project). That way, if a pump series goes down, he can go in and determine which switch controls the shutoff.”


  • 0
    0
    1
    207
    1181
    Proactive Management
    9
    2
    1386
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    Last month, Ed Avis, Managing Director of the IRgA,
    conducted an interview of the two gents who are responsible for the launch of
    this new wide-format printer from Xerox.
     
    In that interview, the gents from Xerox provided an explanation (an
    estimate) of “operating costs.”  (Reprographics 101 also put up two or three posts about this new equipment from Xerox.)

    This
    was my follow-up question to the guys at Xerox about operating costs:
    (Numbers below do not
    include the cost of print-media, the cost of the equipment, nor the cost of
    labor required to operate the equipment.)
    Operating
    Cost at 8.5% coverage area?
    In the interview it says that the operating cost,
    including ink, print-heads and service, will be around $.20 per sq ft at 85%
    coverage. If all I wanted to produce on the printer is typical A/E drawing plan
    sets (CAD color printing) and if my expected average coverage was 8.5%, what
    would the per-sq-ft operating cost be for that?
    Joel Salus
    This
    was Xerox’s reply to that follow-up question:
    Operating costs
    With 8.5% area coverage and printing at 53,820 square
    feet per month the estimated operating cost is around $0.05 per square foot (this includes print heads, ink, waste
    container and service). This is a guideline. Your actual results will vary
    based on area coverage, job run length and average monthly square footage
    volume.
    Geoffrey Rummel, Xerox Wide Format Manager