• Note:  Blog Publisher’s comments appear at the end
    of this post.
    To
    begin, in my e-mail in-box this morning, I found an e-mail from Canon,
    subject above.  The e-mail led me to a
    White Paper published by Canon on this subject.
    Here’s
    what the e-mail said:

    For large
    format documents, which approach gives you the best cost control?

    There is no
    clear-cut answer as to which is the better way to go, but only you can make
    the decision that will change your company’s bottom-line results! However,
    recent customer data shows that it is not unusual to save 46% or more on your
    outsourced large format printing costs when printing in-house. Other major
    decision factors for printing in-house include:

    Quality
    Control
    — Maintain
    consistency with the quality of your prints when printing in-house

    Document Waste — Print only what’s needed and
    stop paying for unwanted excess material often provided by outsource vendors

    Meet Deadlines — Be more productive by
    effectively managing your own schedule and staying on top of your projects

    Download our
    FREE white paper now to stay ahead of the competition and find out if
    printing in-house or outsourcing your printing projects is optimal for your
    company!
    And, here’s a few paragraphs from the White Paper I downloaded.  (At the end of the blog
    post, I’ll provide a link so that anyone who wants to can download the White
    Paper.)
    Printing Large
    Format Technical
    Documents—
    What’s Best:
    Print
    In-house or
    Outsource?
    In business, one
    of the many keys to success is effective control over expenses, no matter how
    big or small the organization. One area that often gets overlooked in AEC
    business operations is the cost of printing large format technical documents.
    Because large format technical documents are such a critical part of an AEC
    firm’s operations, the question becomes; should you print your large format
    documents in-house or outsource the printing of them?
    Like many
    questions, there is no clear cut easy answer; it depends on a number of
    factors. For example, if you just consider the actual drawing costs as measured
    in cost/sq. ft., it generally is less costly to print in-house.
    Based on current
    market survey information, outsourced printing costs can be as high as $40/page
    for 24″ x 36″ color printed maps and construction documents and
    $4.50/page for 24″ x 36″ black & white printed construction
    documents. Printing these same documents in-house can usually be done for much
    less with an investment in a large format printer. In fact, recent customer
    data shows it is not unusual to save 46% or more on your outsourced large
    format printing costs when printing in-house.
    Blog Publisher’s Comments:
    My first comment:  Where
    the White Paper says this,
    One area that often gets overlooked in AEC business operations is the cost
    of printing large format technical documents.”
     
    While
    that may have been an accurate statement many
    years ago, it certainly hasn’t been the case for many years.  Over the 28
    years that I was active in business development in the reprographics business,
    I met, and spoke to, hundreds of A/E customers; it was rare to find any A/E
    customer unaware that plot/print costs added up.
    My second comment:  Apparently, the folks at Canon Solutions
    America are unaware that “cost” is not the major issue; the major issue is “cost recovery”.  Many A/E firms are entitled to recover the
    cost of plotting/printing.  That’s the
    primary reason why “tracking” software is so important – and in widespread use
    in – I’m speaking of tracking software such as AbacusPCR, SepiaLine and
    SmartPlot.  And, this issue is why its
    very wise for A/E firms to outsource plot/print work to reprographers, whether
    outsourcing is in the form of outsourcing to a reprographer’s production center
    or outsourcing to an in-house FM service managed by a reprographer (or both
    methods.)
    To Canon’s credit, they did say this in the White Paper in the “pro’s
    and con’s section”: 
    “Instead of buying the machine, there are providers that will only charge
    you for what you print, plus a nominal monthly service fee. This model gives
    you a unique option to pay for only what you use without making an upfront
    investment, but have the convenience of an onsite device.”

    My third comment:  In the White Paper, Canon Solutions America
    says this, “Based on current market survey
    information, outsourced printing costs can be as high as $40/page for 24″
    x 36″ color printed maps and construction documents and $4.50/page for
    24″ x 36″ black & white printed construction documents.”
      Where the heck did these prices come
    from?  I’d surely like to examine the
    survey that Canon mentions!  As high as
    $40/page for 24×36 color construction documents?  Really? 
    That works out to a price of $6.67 per sq ft for color CAD prints!  I don’t know of a single reprographer who
    gets anywhere close to that price for Color CAD prints (and I know a lot of
    reprographers.)  And, as high as
    $4.50/page for 24×36 black & white prints? 
    That works out to a price of $.75 per sq ft.  Again, really?!  In Canon’s defense, they did use the term, “as
    high as”.  But, to me, that’s very
    misleading advertising.
    In defense of Canon, it is Canon’s objective to sell as much equipment
    (and consumables) as they can, so no one can fault Canon for reaching out directly
    to A/E/C firms with White Papers like this one. 
    Reprographers who offer FM services could benefit from what Canon says
    in its White Paper. Reprographers who don’t offer FM services will not.  (Are there really reprographers who don’t yet offer
    FM services?)
    As promised, here’s
    a link to get to the White Paper Canon published:

    v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}

    0
    0
    1
    900
    5131
    Proactive Management
    42
    12
    6019
    14.0

    Normal
    0
    false

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • I’d like to thank friends who’ve suggested that there be two separate lists in the Reprographics Industry Hall of Fame, for I think that was a great suggestion!


    If you visit the (brand-new) Reprographics Industry Hall of Fame web-site and navigate to the List of Inductees web-page, you will notice two different “buttons”:


      — Lists of Individuals and Families


      — Technology Recognition List


    In the right-hand side-bar of the blog, there’s a link to The Reprographics Industry Hall of Fame.

  • Report issued June 20, 2014 by IDC
    (International Data Corp):
    Click on this link:

    0
    0
    1
    52
    297
    Proactive Management
    2
    1
    348
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}


    Blog Publisher’s Comment:

    I fully expect to see HP increase its market share lead beginning in the 2nd half of 2015, when HP begins shipping its PageWide-technology wide-foramt print systems.
  • The address of the web-site is:

    0
    0
    1
    52
    297
    Proactive Management
    2
    1
    348
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    And, there’s a link to the Hall of Fame
    web-site at the top of the side-bar on the right-hand side of this blog.
  • I received this via e-mail, yesterday, from
    someone who attended the HP “Channel Partner” meeting in San Diego, which
    meeting was held a day or two after the “Premiere Event” I attended.

    0
    0
    1
    197
    1126
    Proactive Management
    9
    2
    1321
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    “In regards
    to the HP……. I was in San Diego week before this past week
    attending HP’s channel partner meeting.  They unveiled the PageWide
    machine.  Unbelievable.  It will turn reprographics upside
    down.  It will turn point of sale poster printing up side down. 
    This thing was literally printing 25-30 D size per minute full color.
      The
    engineer there, not sure if he was pulling our leg, said that it could actually
    go twice as fast as that.  The issue is designing a sturdy enough frame
    and the mechanisms capable of letting the paper pass through the machine
    faster.  The machine we looked at…and they would NOT let us video
    or take pictures … would hold 6 – 650′ rolls of media.  The plan is to
    have three units (2 roll, 4 roll, and 6 roll).
      There will be an
    integrated scanner as well.  I’m telling you HP did it right.  OH….
    by the way …. it works, unlike MemJet.  One final thing, HP is going to
    severely limit who sells these units.  From what I was told _________ will
    be their primary national reseller, and ______ will be one as well.”
  • FROM “news” on NRI’S web-site:
    “NRI was proud to sponsor the WRT / Bloomfield & Associates / Olaya Studio Canstruction team. Over 57,000 cans of food were donated to Philabundance between the 16 competing teams. Click here for a time-lapse video of the build.”

    Reprographers, reach out and get involved in Canstruction events in your market area!
  • Rec’d from a friend this evening:
    “All I can say Joel, is, PageWide reminds me of a song the two of us
    will recall from our younger days:”

    0
    0
    1
    47
    268
    Proactive Management
    2
    1
    314
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • Awesome
    article just out on the IRgA website:

    Link:

    0
    0
    1
    65
    376
    Proactive Management
    3
    1
    440
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • Article up on the CalculatedRisk Blog; here’s the link:

    0
    0
    1
    48
    274
    Proactive Management
    2
    1
    321
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • At the
    Premiere Event on Monday this past week, where HP introduced its first
    high-speed, high-volume, PageWide technology, wide-format printer (which will not
    be available until the 2
    nd half of 2015), HP did not reveal the
    output speed of the printer.
    So, at this
    point, all I can do is speculate about the speed of the new printer; the math
    I’m going to put forth (about the output speed of the new wide-format printer)
    is based on the output speed of HP’s fastest-model PageWide technology
    small-format printer, the
    HP Officejet Pro X576dw,
    which outputs at up to 70 – 8 ½ x 11 prints per minute.
    Based on the
    info above, it’s possible that the high-speed, high volume, PageWide
    technology, wide-format printer will generate output at up to 64 linear feet
    per minute.  HP said that the first model
    will have a print width of 40”.
    24×36 prints will be output 36” wide, and, if
    the printer does generate output at up to 64 linear feet per minute
    , that
    would mean that the printer could output
    32 – 24×36 prints per minute, which equates to approximately 11,500 sq ft per
    hour.  In color or in black & white.
    30×42 prints will be output 30” wide, and, if
    the printer does generate output at up to 64 linear feet per minute
    , that
    would mean that the printer could output
    18 – 30×42 prints per minute, which equates to approximately 9,600 sq ft per
    hour.  In color or black & white.
    In other words….. blazing fast!
    HP PageWide
    technology wide-format printers will feature 2 sets of ink, so ink cartridges
    can be changed on the fly.
    HP PageWide
    technology wide-format printers will feature multiple rolls, roll-feed, and
    auto-switching.  One roll runs out,
    machine will change to another roll on the fly.
    HP PageWide
    technology wide-format printers will use pigmented ink and the ink on a freshly
    generated print, apparently, is instant dry. 
    No smudge, no smear.  At the
    Premiere Event, one of the HP guys poured water on a print; no affect on the
    ink.  (I wanted to remind him that bond
    paper does not like water, but I kept my mouth shut.)
    HP PageWide
    technology wide-format printers will accept optional stacker units or optional
    folder units.
    In other words, HP’s PageWide technology
    wide-format printers will be highly
    productive.
    In my past
    life, we used, sold and FM’d HP plotters. 
    My experience with HP wide-format equipment was outstanding.  High degree of reliability.  If
    HP’s first PageWide wide-format printer proves to be as reliable as HP’s past
    and existing plotters, HP’s going to win big. 
    It is going to be very, very difficult for OCE/Canon, KIP and Xerox (and
    any other wide-format manufacturer) to compete with HP.
    If HP does end up offering equipment that is
    faster than LED equipment, that offers color and black & white, that proves
    to be highly reliable, and that costs less to operate, HP’s going to expand its
    market share quickly, to the detriment of the industry’s other wide-format
    equipment manufacturers.  Reprographers,
    do you remember what happened to Xerox’s wide-format, digital, b/w equipment
    business when OCE came out with the OCE 9800? 
    Reprographers, do you remember what happened to Xerox’s wide-format,
    xerographic b/w equipment business when Shacoh came out with the Shacoh 920?

    0
    0
    1
    514
    2932
    Proactive Management
    24
    6
    3440
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    This will be my last post (at least for the
    time being) about HP’s PageWide technology wide-format printers.