• Your thoughts and comments are invited.

    One of the websites I frequent is http://www.whatheythink.com. Although that website is not devoted to the “reprographics” industry (it is devoted to the “printing” industry), many of the articles on that website (and the discussions provoked by various articles) do touch on issues that are important to the reprographics industry.

    About 3 weeks ago, one of the articles that appeared on whattheythink.com was this one:

    Ramblings, Whinings, and Admonitions
    By Dr. Joe Webb on August 25th, 2010

    In one of the paragraphs in that article, Dr Webb said this:
    “This is why focusing on economic conditions as the catalyst for improvement in print volumes is misplaced. We’re having a communications revolution playing out in handheld devices that is in many ways more powerful that the introduction of the telegraph, radio, and television. Technology is stronger than the effects of any general economic upturn or downturn.”

    On July 12th, I posted the most recent “A/E/C Repro PPoP Index” (an index that attempts to track sales of “plans printed on paper”. Comparing the index-readings, Q2 2010 vs. Q2 2007, the index-reading “says that” sales of plans-printed-on-paper are down by almost 50% (index-reading .60 vs. index-reading of 1.18). If that index reading is even remotely close to what’s really happened to revenues from plans-printed-on-paper, that’s a very, very scary situation for reprographers, and I don’t think that any reprographer would disagree with that statement.

    Many of the articles I’ve posted over the last two years have been directed towards “what’s going on in the AEC industry” (factors affecting the health of that industry, such as the availability of financing for real estate development projects, etc), good news, bad news, etc. Some of the articles I’ve posted over the last two years have been directed towards changes in technology that have, or will have (or may have), an effect on “recovery” from a reprographer’s perspective.

    During past recessions that negatively impacted the AEC Industry and the Reprographics Industry, A/E firms got hurt and Reprographers got hurt. But, when those recessions went by the wayside, A/E firms recovered and Reprographers recovered. “Recovery”, back then, was “simply” a matter of Owners and Developers getting back to business, creating projects, getting financing commitments, hiring A/E firms …. and, yes, Reprographers’ printing revenues increased as our customers’ project-related activities increased. In other words, “recovery” for reprographers was a foregone conclusion – when the AEC industry got healthy, so did we. And, based on my experience (or, I should say, due to my age and exposure), after the recovery was in full swing, we (reprographers) always grew larger (I’m speaking about our sales revenues from printing plans and specs) than we were before “the last recession” started. In other words, it was almost a given that reprographers, who managed to make it through a recession, experienced excellent sales and profits at some later point in time (after a recession was done and over with and a recovery was well underway.)

    Over the past year, many reprographers I’ve spoken to (or have heard from by e-mail) appear to be very concerned that, after this current recession (which I’ve referred to as a depression) in the AEC Industry is done and over with, the reprographics business will not recover the same way it has after past recessions. The term “paradigm” shift comes to mind. Some reprographers are saying that, because this recession has been so hard and deep, customers have changed their ordering habits; customers are ordering far fewer “printed” sets of plans and specs and are ordering more sets of CD’s (or, worse yet, are bypassing reprographers and simply distributing files on their own – to project participants, GC’s, Subs, etc.) And, technological advancements, such as paperless permitting (check out the City of Atlanta) and further developments in software targeted at project documentation and collaboration …. and BIM, are continuing to peck away at “the customer’s need or desire to print”. I find it difficult not to imagine, at some not-so-distant point in the future, an environment where plans and specs (and other documents related to projects) are hosted on a “project document collaboration site” and made accessible to (or are distributed, at the click of a mouse, to) PC’s, MAC’s and to jumbo-sized iPAD’s (or similar display hardware) and where participants will use electronic pencils for mark-ups and comments, and where bidders will use software for take-offs (estimating.) “Some say” that we are (or are mostly) already there!

    Simply my own personal opinion, but I do think that reprographers will recover from the current depression. But, I don’t think that revenues from “printing plans on paper” will recover like they’ve recovered in the past. Technological advancements in hardware and software (and communications technology vis a vis anything that has to do with the Internet) are moving more quickly than at any time in the past, even in spite of the current recession. Customers are looking for faster, easier ways to communicate …. and faster and easier ways to communicate “information”; customers are looking at anything that will make their team members more productive, enable their team members to accomplish more work in less time.

    Some in the reprographics industry say that this (what I said in the previous paragraph) points to an opportunity for reprographers. Reprographers have long been relied on (by customers in the AEC community and by customers in the RED community) to “manage information” and “distribute” information. Meaning, we do have “relationships” and that we have earned at least some measure of “trust.” I do agree that this is an opportunity for reprographers.

    However, as I said very recently to a friend (who has been involved in the reprographics industry for nearly as long as I have):

    “Reprographers were all about printing and distribution of documents; even though we (reprographers) say we’re in the document management and document logistics and “technology” business, reprographers, at their very heart, are printers. You are aware, I’m sure, that, even nowadays, over 85% of “a typical reprographer’s” revenues are generated by “printing” and “finishing”. When customers, for whatever reason or reasons, decide to print less (or, worse yet, stop printing), the reprographics industry becomes less relevant (or, worse yet, irrelevant), at least from a “reprographics” perspective. 5 years from now (perhaps less, who really knows), a reprographer who, years before, had 3 branches in a market and employed 100 people [e.g., back in the mid 1980’s (when business was hot and heavy) or back in the middle of the 2000-2010 decade (when things were equally hot and heavy)], could easily wind up needing only 50 (or less) employees…… if printing continues to diminish as quickly as its been diminishing and if “all” that a reprographer is (mostly) doing (in the “new times”) is providing and charging for document management, document oversight, and document distribution/logistics. Which kind of provokes the larger question; if “printing revenues” (the profit from those is what paid funded our salaries, our bonuses, our houses, our cars, our vacations, our perqs) are diminishing and are expected to further decline, or, worse yet, are expected to evaporate for the most part, then is it even going to be possible for the “reprographics” industry to remain relevant …. and profitable? I’ve never been able to predict the future, but if we simply take a look at what’s happened in the small-format document space (since developments in that space always happen in advance of developments in the large-format document space), the future of “prints on paper” does not look outstanding. While I do believe that reprographers have “the relationships” (with those who do have needs for help with document management, document distribution, and document logistics, that doesn’t necessarily mean (i.e., it is not “a given”) that reprographers will be able to benefit from those relationships. The future of reprographics (or, I should say, the future for reprographers) is going to require a “reinvention” of who we are and what we do….. and how we are thought of. Reprographers who don’t make the change may survive, but their companies will be a lot smaller, revenue-wise, profit-wise, than they were in the past. But, even reprographers who do make the change will very likely experience much lower revenues and profits than they achieved in the past. [(And, this is the major reason why “consolidation” will continue to happen in the reprographics industry; some of that consolidation will happen not because of “acquisitions”, but from reprographers bailing out, closing their doors (the latter, if this depression continues another couple of years.)]”

    Okay, sorry, that was a mouthful, for sure.

    What are your thoughts?

    1. Do you think that reprographers will experience the same rebound in revenues from “plans printed on paper” that they experienced after previous recessions were over and done with?

    2. If you do not, then what do you think will happen to the size of reprographics companies (number of employees going forward vs. prior to the current recession)?

    3. Do you believe that reprographers can successfully participate in the document management, document distribution, document logistics space, simply because they have “relationships” with participants in the AEC community?

    4. Do you think that the reprographics business and industry is experiencing a “paradigm shift”, and, if so, what do you see as the major factors causing (or that will cause) that shift?

    And, please share any additional thoughts you have about “the future of the reprographics business and industry.”

    Please either e-mail your comments to me or post your comments as “comments” on my blog. My e-mail address is joel.salus@mac.com For those of you who e-mail comments to me and who do not want me to reveal your name if I do a follow-up article, then simply tell me that you want to remain anonymous, and I will certainly honor your request to remain anonymous.

    Thank you.

    p.s., please let your friends and associates (and competitors) in the reprographics business and industry know about “Reprographics 101”.

  • One of my blog-readers e-mailed me to let me know about this “new news” from AutoDesk. (Thank you, Trevor!)

    I can’t imagine anyone trying to review or mark-up a large-format A/E drawing on an iPHONE or on an iPODTOUCH – but that’s because my eyesight isn’t as good as it was when I was a young guy. Even doing that on an iPAD’s larger screen would be challenging, eyesight-wise, to me. But, many people (and especially younger people) are comfortable using “small display screens” to view “large-format” documents. Beyond that, there are “display screen” technology companies working on larger portable display-screen devices, including “flexible” display screens that would roll-up just like a “blueprint” is rolled-up.

    Anyway, here’s the article that my blog-reader pointed me to (see Internet-address below)

    AECbytes Newsletter #46 (Sep 9, 2010)
    AutoCAD Comes to the Mac … and the iPad!

    http://www.aecbytes.com/newsletter/2010/issue_46.html

  • Towards the end of the AIA article (published by the AIA in August 2010) about the July 2010 ABI Index, the author of the article, Jennifer Riskus, Manager of Economic Research, reported the following:

    This month’s special questions followed up on last month’s questions about the timing of project design phases. Survey respondents reported that the largest share of their projects (42%) have a design phase (defined as lasting from the awarding of the design contract to the completion of the construction documents) that lasts less than six months, while an additional 24% of projects have a design phase typically lasting between six and nine months. Small firms are much more likely to have shorter design phases than large firms, with 59% of projects at firms with less than $250,000 in annual billings having design phases of less than six months, compared to just 23% of projects at firms with annual billings of $5 million or more. Projects at firms with an institutional specialization also tend to have a slightly longer design phase, with nearly half (47%) of projects at those firms having a design phase lasting between six and 12 months.

    Our panelists indicated that the complexity of a project is the most important influence on the length of the design phase, followed by project size (construction value), type of client, and scope of design services offered. The project delivery method (e.g., design-build, design-bid-build, integrated project delivery) was not considered to be a very important factor.

    – – – – – – – – – –

    Joel’s comments: All this does is pretty much confirm what reprographers have been saying for years. Architects begin to recover, revenue-wise, before Reprographers do, by about 6-9 months. For Reprographers, FM (OnSite) revenue should be a leading predictor of production center (off-site) revenue recovery (or, should I say, growth.)

  • Associates of mine in Europe are interesting in finding out how U.S. reprographers are dealing with the issue of “file downloads”.

    When the first reprographer-operated Internet PlanRooms began showing up in the U.S., most, if not all, did not permit (or, perhaps better put, did not enable) “file downloads.” They offered “file viewing” and “print-ordering.” Today, some reprographers, but certainly not all, operate PlanRooms that do enable file downloads in addition to file viewing and print-ordering.

    Questions for the reprographer community:

    – – What percent of U.S. reprographers do YOU think are now permitting “file downloads” from their Internet PlanRooms?

    – – Of the U.S. reprographers who are permitting file downloads, what percent of U.S. reprographers who do so do YOU think are permitting file downloads “for free”? (in other words, for a price of $.00 per file download)

    – – Of the U.S. reprographers who are charging for file downloads, what do YOU think is the current range of prices for file downloads? (In other words, from a high of $x.xx per file to a low of $y.yy per file).

    Kindly either a) post your response as a comment to this post or b) send me an email at joel.salus@mac.com

    Thank you.

  • COMMENT: Right at this moment, it is 4:12 a.m. east coast USA time and 10:12 am where I am in Europe. I just noticed an article, on Yahoo Asia, about the July 2010 AIA ABI Index ….. so, here it is ….. (Yahoo attributes the article to Reuters.com, but I was unable to find the article on Reuters) ……

    U.S. architecture billings index up in July -AIA
    Reuters – Wednesday, August 18

    * AIA July billings index up 1.9 pts to 47.9

    * Project inquiries index drops 4.6 pts to 53.1

    * Conditions remain volatile, trade group says

    NEW YORK, Aug 18 – A closely watched leading indicator of U.S. nonresidential construction spending rose in July but remained at a level that indicates falling demand for the 30th consecutive month, an architects’ trade group said on Wednesday.

    The Architecture Billings Index was up 1.9 points last month to 47.9, the American Institute of Architects said. A forward-looking index of project inquiries fell 4.6 points to 53.1.

    Readings above 50 indicate expansion, while those below 50 point to declining demand. Inquiries have stayed above 50 in recent months as builders seek multiple bids for design projects.

    Business conditions remain volatile amid tight credit for construction. A weak economy, depressed real estate values and high unemployment have meant less need to put up structures like stores and office buildings.

    “We continue to receive a mixed bag of feedback on the condition of the design market, from improving to flat to being paralyzed by uncertainty,” said AIA Chief Economist Kermit Baker.

    None of the four geographic regions tracked by the group was above 50, and only the commercial/industrial sector was above that mark in July.

    The AIA’s billings index is an indicator of construction spending nine to 12 months in the future, so current readings suggest a recovery will not take root until sometime in 2011.

    The index is cited by companies that sell into the sector as a reliable gauge of demand. The AIA has forecast a 20 percent drop in spending on nonresidential construction this year, followed by a modest rebound in 2011.

    Most diversified industrial companies derive at least some revenue from the nonresidential sector, selling machinery used in construction or the components of a building: elevators, electrical and lighting systems, heating and cooling and security networks, for example.

  • I found this article on http://www.costar.com

    Costar Group is the # 1 Commercial Real Estate Information Company (Yes, that’s what they say on their website.)

    AIA Forecast: Private Commercial Construction To Fall Nearly 30% in 2010
    Overall Nonresidential Development On Track for Deeper Decline This Year; Modest Uptick Predicted for 2011
    By Randyl Drummer
    July 20, 2010

    Spending on commercial and other nonresidential construction is likely to fall more than 20% this year — significantly more than forecasters predicted six months ago — with hotel and office construction down by more than 43% and 29%, respectively, according to the American Institute of Architects’ (AIA) midyear look at construction.

    Even with a modest U.S. economic recovery under way, overall nonresidential spending is expected to drop 20.3% for 2010 — and nearly 30% for private commercial development — before edging up 3.1% in 2011, according to the AIA’s semi-annual Consensus Construction Forecast, a survey of the nation’s leading construction forecasters. Manufacturing facilities will see a 20% spending decline. Even dollars allocated to new government and other institutional buildings, previously a pillar of strength for builders, will likely fall 12%.

    Meanwhile, another bit of breaking news from the AIA this week, the monthly Architect Billings Index (ABI), seems to confirm that construction weakness will most likely continue deep into next year.

    Most significant commercial structures are designed by architects or other design professionals, making it instructive to examine how busy those designers are right now making blueprints and drawings that will ultimately lead to grading or a ceremonial construction ground breaking, nine months to a year in the future. According to the latest ABI, the architects association’s monthly survey of client billings, recovery may not be imminent.

    Although the ABI report of June released Wednesday showed a slight slowing in the rate of decline in new building design activity, the index remains at 46 — well below the threshold of 50 denoting positive growth in architect invoices.

    Historically, actual hard construction activity doesn’t begin to recover until 9 to 12 months after billings from design firms begin to grow again and projects move off the drawing board and into the development pipeline.

    The AIA’s consensus forecast panel was downbeat at the beginning of the year, projecting a 13.4% decline in construction spending for nonresidential projects. But at midyear, their outlook is still bleaker.

    “Our construction forecast panel expects the weakness in the construction sector to continue well into 2011,” said AIA Chief Economist Kermit Baker.

    Most nonresidential construction building categories are weighed down by some degree of oversupply, combined with weak demand, declines in commercial property values, difficulty getting project financing and macroeconomic uncertainty. Those factors have contributed to “one of the steepest construction downturns in generations,” Baker said.

    “We have businesses nervous about expanding their facilities, a fragile financial sector, excess commercial space, and general unease in the international economy,” Baker said.

    Despite the glum assessment, there are still tendrils of optimism among economists and construction executives that conditions will get better next year.

    Despite the projected decline of nearly 30% in commercial construction for 2010, architect billings for commercial projects was the only sector of the ABI to record positive gains in June. That points to a slight recovery next year, which correlates with the Baker’s projection of 3.1% growth in total nonresidential construction in 2011.

    Public and institutional construction, which held its own during the recession, is now feeling the bite of canceled municipal projects, diminishing stimulus money and budget shortfalls. Frank Martinez, executive vice president for Laguna Beach, CA-based Griffin Structures, said the competition for the small pool of contracts is fierce.

    [Joel’s comment: the above comment by Frank Martinez is ‘good news’ for reprographers, for the fiercer the competition in project bidding, the more sets of plans and specs that will be ordered.]

    Martinez said a typical contract put out by one Los Angeles-area school district, which typically would have drawn eight or 10 bidders a couple years ago, now easily draws 50 to 100. Much of that new competition is from single-family home builders displaced by the downturn and seeking to infill their businesses with commercial and public work, he said.

    That said, longtime pessimism among builders is slowly giving way to guarded optimism, according to Martinez.

    “We’re actually starting to see more RFPs [requests for proposals] coming out,” said the executive for Griffin, which has done $1.5 billion in construction projects, the bulk of them buildings for county and municipal agencies.

    Government deficits and spending cuts to make up budget shortfalls have had a major impact on public sector construction, Martinez said.

    “With the state of California taking $2 billion from municipalities and poised to take more to staunch its red ink, it’s forcing cities to be more creative with less, including fewer staff. In turn, we have to be more creative.”

    That often means developing projects in stages and helping clients find alternative financing solutions, Martinez said. Lower staffing levels mean agencies may not be equipped to hit the ground running as fast when economic growth picks up speed, he said.

    The U.S. economy is improving, but demand for space and ultimately new commercial construction typically lags recovery in job markets and the broader economy by several quarters.

    Although commercial property values have fallen more than 40% from their mid-2007 highs through the first quarter of this year, the declines have slowed significantly since the middle of last year. The risk of commercial mortgage and construction loan defaults remains a serious concern until values recover, however.

    Tight lending standards continue to create problems for new nonresidential projects, the AIA’s Baker noted. The Federal Reserve Board’s Senior Loan Officer Survey on Bank Lending Practices still points to restrictive lending conditions for commercial real estate loans. The April 2010 survey indicated that most banks kept their lending standards unchanged in the first quarter, and a few even tightened terms on business loans.

  • Found on http://www.wide-formatimaging.com …..
    Updated: August 9th, 2010 09:16 AM EDT

    C2 Reprographics Opens Its Sixth Southern California Location

    At a time when many construction-related firms are scaling back, C2 Reprographics has announced the opening of a sixth location that will serve Los Angeles’ South Bay area. The new C2 location in Torrance at 2221 West 190th Street, Unit A, at Van Ness Avenue, opened on August 2, the company’s second Los Angeles location. C2 has three locations in Orange County and one in San Diego.

    Johnny Williams, a 16-year reprographics industry veteran, will lead the Torrance shop as manager to oversee operations and staff. Jack Willis, a South Bay native from Palos Verdes Estates with more than 20 years of sales experience and currently C2’s downtown Los Angeles representative, will move to the South Bay location to serve the area.

    “We are pleased to be opening our new location in the South Bay. We will bring C2’s premier customer service to an area which has been underserved by our industry,” said Gary Crisp, president and CEO, C2 Repro.

  • At the last IRgA Convention, one of the officers of the IRgA talked about the “declining membership” situation. Due to industry consolidation (primarily ARC) and the growth of affinity groups (PEiR Group, ReproMAX and RSA), the number of IRgA memberships has been on a downward spiral, for at least the past three or four years.

    As I’ve said in several previous posts, my former companies were IRgA members, and, there is no question in my mind that both of my former companies derived benefits from being IRgA members. (One of my former companies was a member of MiniMAX and ReproCAD and the other one was a member of ReproMAX and The PEiR Group. And, at the same time, we were also IRgA members.)

    It’s now been three months since the last IRgA Convention, and, a couple of weeks ago, one of my industry friends (who is in a high position with a large reprographics enterprise) posed several questions about the IRgA …. these questions, basically, are restated and summarized by the following bullet points …..

    1) If the IRgA had a full-time CEO, would the IRgA be better operated …. like any other business where the CEO is full-time dedicated to the mission of the business?

    2) Why are the affinity groups (PG, RM, RSA) succeeding, gaining members, whereas the IRgA’s membership is in decline? Is the lack of a full-time IRgA CEO – a person who would be solely focused on driving the goals of the group and thinking about benefits for the members – one of the reasons for that?

    3) Would IRgA members benefit from the development of additional, industry-sponsored “standards?” (An example of an industry standard is the “square foot chart” that the IRgA came up with many years ago; in my opinion, any reprographer who adopted that standard derived great benefits.) Could the development of additional new standards include matters like “standards for charging for digital services”, “standards for billing seat licenses”, and matters similar to those?

    The biggest question in my mind is “how does the IRgA remain relevant?” If it cannot remain relevant, then the IRgA will probably not be around several years from now, especially if its membership roll continues to decline.

    While I am a proponent of the development of industry-sponsored standards – for all reprographers stand to benefit financially from those – I have no real interest in using my blog-site to lobby IRgA Officers and Board Members to “get with the program” of developing standards; that’s something that YOU should be doing, if, of course, you believe that the IRgA should be doing that.

    The financial challenge that the IRgA faces can only be solved by two things happening. #1 – consolidators must require their operating companies to be dues-paying members of the IRgA, #2 – affinity groups must require their member companies to be dues-paying members of the IRgA, and #3 – all non-member reprographers should continued to be encouraged to join the IRgA. Without that, there may not be an IRgA several years from now.

  • ARC (NYSE: ARP)
    SHARES CLOSED AT $8.25 USD, yesterday, August 10, 2010

    52 Week high – $11.31 USD
    52 Week low – $5.11 USD

    SERVICE POINT SOLUTIONS (SPSL.MC) [BOLSA (Spain) Stock Exchange]
    SHARES CLOSED AT .56 EURO, yesterday, August 10, 2010

    52 Week high – 1.23 EURO
    52 Week low – .53 EURO

    CURRENT ANALYST RECOMMENDATIONS (as of August 10, 2010, per Reuters.com)
    AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS vs. SERVICE POINT SOLUTIONS:

    ANALYST RECOMMENDATIONS – for AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS
    Number of Analysts with current “Buy” recommendation -1
    Number of Analysts with current “Outperform” recommendation – 0
    Number of Analysts with current “Hold” recommendation – 4
    Number of Analysts with current “Underperform” recommendation -0
    Number of Analysts with current “Sell” recommendation – 0

    ANALYST RECOMMENDATIONS – for SERVICE POINT SOLUTIONS
    Number of Analysts with current “Buy” recommendation -1
    Number of Analysts with current “Outperform” recommendation – 0
    Number of Analysts with current “Hold” recommendation – 0
    Number of Analysts with current “Underperform” recommendation -1
    Number of Analysts with current “Sell” recommendation – 2

  • Most reprographers, by now, know who mimeo.com is. If you don’t, they are the digital copying/printing company (based) in Memphis (TN) that, years ago, developed some very cool proprietary software that enabled customers to submit documents in virtually any file format and be able to get immediately on-line proofs. Mimeo.com convinces customers, wherever they are, to submit their print jobs, over the Internet, to Mimeo’s large production hub in Memphis, where jobs are printed (often overnight) and then overnight-shipped via Fedex to anywhere in the U.S. PlansExpress was also in that business in Memphis (may still be, for all I know), but whereas Mimeo.com specialized in “small-format”, PlansExpress specialized in “AEC large-format.” The “nice thing” about shipping from Memphis – you only have to pay Fedex “one-way”, since Fedex’s main distribution hub is in Memphis.

    Anyway, I just noticed that Mimeo.com entered into some sort of “strategic alliance” with the three U.S.-based quick-copy/digital printing franchisors owned by FSI. Here’s the press release:

    Sir Speedy, PIP and Signal Graphics Launch Strategic Alliance with Mimeo.com
    NEW ALLIANCE PROMISES TO TRANSFORM THE IMAGING AND PRINTING ENVIRONMENT FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESSES

0 7/29/2010

    MISSION VIEJO, Calif., July 29, 2010 – Franchise Services, Inc., (FSI) parent company of Sir Speedy, PIP Printing and Marketing Services and Signal Graphics, and Mimeo.com, a print technology solutions company, today announced a new production print solution that enables business customers to have anywhere, anytime access to printing. 

Under the terms of a new strategic alliance between the two companies, Mimeo’s print technology platform will support the Sir Speedy, PIP and Signal Graphics brands so that their customers will have remote access to a scalable online solution that includes virtual proofing, an unlimited document library, document management and online ordering and tracking tools. The program is designed to enable Sir Speedy, PIP and Signal Graphics franchise brands to capture a larger share of the $108 billion dollar global digital print market, with a focus on the 65% of all print expenditures that fall to printing and marketing services providers. 



    “Our goal with this program is to help our franchisees capture those customers who prefer to order their printed documents online, customers we have not easily had access to in the past,” said Richard Lowe, President and Chief Operating Officer of Franchise Services. “Now a business customer will be able to place an order by 10 p.m. EST and receive it by 8:00 the next morning.” 

“We are pleased to support FSI’s franchisees with the Software as a Service (SaaS) applications and expanded digital production print capabilities sought by their customers,” said Adam Slutsky, Mimeo.com CEO. “This complementary alliance combines the best of what we both have to offer, world class solutions that can help businesses of any size optimize the way they print and distribute documents through 24/7 access to a virtual library and online ordering portal.”



    About Franchise Services
Franchise Services, Inc., (FSI) is a franchise management company that owns the franchise brands, Sir Speedy, PIP Printing and Marketing Services, Signal Graphics, MultiCopy, TeamLogic IT and Copies Now. Franchise Services has a 40-year history managing award-winning brands that support the small- to medium-sized business market. The company’s brands and worldwide affiliates encompass more than 600 locations in 13 countries.

FSI’s brands have received numerous awards and recognition including; the Franchise Times Top 200, Entrepreneur’s Franchise 500, Quick Printing Top 100, Printing Impressions 400, Franchise Times Fast 55, Franchise 50 and the International Franchise Association’s Franchisee of the Year Award.

    About Mimeo.com
Mimeo.com is the innovator of online, on-demand cloud printing services. Over 60% of the Fortune 100 rely on Mimeo’s award winning document management tools and print on demand solutions to lower document related costs while improving employee productivity. The privately held company was founded in 1998. Investors include Hewlett Packard (HP), Goldman Sachs (GS), Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Harbourvest, and DFJ Gotham.