• Reprographics 101 is now in the process of
    conducting two different Surveys.
    A. 
    Survey about Wide-Format A/E/C Plan Printing Equipment:
    This Survey is open to
    participation by all Reprographers, whether they are located in the U.S. or
    outside of the U.S.
    This Survey relates to wide-format printing
    equipment, specifically limited to wide-format equipment designed to print
    A/E/C plans.  (Note:  the equipment may also be capable of printing
    display graphics.)
    Click on this link to participate in the
    A/E/C Plan Printing Equipment Survey:
    B. 
    Survey about A/E/C Plan Printing Business:
    This survey is only for
    reprographers located in the U.S.  If you
    have locations in and outside the U.S., please do participate in the
    survey.  If your only locations are
    outside of the U.S., please do not participate in the survey.  Thank you.
    Click on this link to participate in the
    A/E/C Plan Printing Business Survey:

    0
    0
    1
    165
    942
    Proactive Management
    7
    2
    1105
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • Another company offering web-based
    services similar to those offered by SmartBidNet

    0
    0
    1
    49
    282
    Proactive Management
    2
    1
    330
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • “Build your business simply and efficiently. Ensure you never see another
    set of paper prints again and achieve the construction results you desire”

    0
    0
    1
    32
    183
    Proactive Management
    1
    1
    214
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • With the apparent
    decline in the volume of A/E/C wide-format printing, one wonders who’s buying
    wide-format systems and, for those who have been buying wide-format print
    systems, what brands and models they’ve been buying.  I sure wish the APDSP would conduct a survey
    on that issue and publish the results. 
    On the high to medium volume (output speed) range, OCE, Xerox, KIP and
    HP offer systems …. and the Vortex 4200 system is still on the market …. and
    The Heavey Group offers ROWE wide-format systems.  That’s a lot of brands to choose from, and if
    the A/E/C print business continues declining, one wonders how all of these
    brands will survive.  I guess the
    question is, who will be the next wide-format system manufacturer to go down
    for the count?
    As reported in
    July on the IRgA (now APDSP) web-site, RTI, then the North American dealer for
    the Vortex 4200 wide-format system, shuttered its business:
    Reprographic Technologies Inc.,
    better known in the industry as RTI, shut its doors in June after about 25
    years in business. What happened?
    “The bottom line is we got extended
    beyond what we were capable of managing, and at that stage elected to exit the
    business completely,” says Erik Norman, the company’s vice president of sales
    and marketing.
    “We gave it a good go,” says Kevin
    Howes, who was RTI’s director of print solutions and is now poised to become
    executive director of RSA (read more about that here). “We were like
    the little engine that could.” In the end, though, the “little engine” just
    couldn’t climb that long hill.
    (Note:  Kevin Howes recently became the Executive
    Director of Reprographic Services Corporation RSA))
    Link
    to the complete story that was authored by Ed Avis and posted on the IRgA
    web-site (now the APDSP web-site):
    Rigoli, an Italian
    company, continues to produce the Vortex 4200.
    What Rigoli said:
    Rigoli will continue making the machine, that company has confirmed in
    an email: “My name is Zsolt Tarjanyi and I was the leader of the development of
    the Vortex 4200 and Vortex 4204 products. I can confirm that Rigoli S.R.L.
    carries on with the production and support of these units.”
    Kevin Shimamoto, general manager of Memjet Wide Format, based in San
    Diego, California, confirmed the relationship with Rigoli.
    “We recently discontinued our OEM agreement with RTI and now have a new
    OEM partner taking over their business, Rigoli, who is the manufacturer of the
    Vortex,” Shimamoto wrote in an email. “They have partnered with the Drafting
    Clinic Canada to support North America under the Rigoli OEM brand. All RTI
    resellers should have already been contacted. Rigoli will support all current
    RTI resellers and end users worldwide with consumables and printer service and
    support.”
    Link to Rigolis’
    web-site:
    Mentioned
    above, The Drafting Clinic Canada, is, apparently, the Vortex 4200 dealer for
    North America.  (Kind of wonder how they
    are doing with sales in the U.S.)  The
    Drafting Clinic Canada, based in the Toronto metro area, apparently offers
    several different brands of wide-format plotter/printer/MFP systems, including
    Canon imagePrograf, KIP, Teriostar and MAX (the latter brand is new to me.)  Apparently,
    they are not dealers for HP plotter/printers/MFP’s, DesignJet or PageWide.  Kind of wondering why that is!
    Link to The Drafting Clinic Canada’s
    web-site:
    At the time RTI went down for the count, an
    auction was held to dispose of RTI’s assets.
    On June 29th
    and 30th (2016), Heritage Global Partners, an auction company,
    conducted an on-line auction to sell off Reprographic Technologies’
    assets.  Here’s a link to the stuff that
    was auctioned off.  Apparently, 6 or 7
    Vortex 4200 wide-format printing systems were included in that auction.  I wonder who bought those; they must have
    gotten spectacular (really cheap) deals. (Just a guess, but I would think that
    The Drafting Clinic Canada bought those systems.)
    Link to auctioned items:

    0
    0
    1
    659
    3757
    Proactive Management
    31
    8
    4408
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • First, a question for Reprographers.  If you offer a web-based planroom service,
    does your planroom connect to, is it compatible with, a web-based
    takeoff/estimating software technology?
    In a previous post on the Repro 101 Blog this
    morning, I posted information about SmartBidNet.  On SmartBidNet’s web-site, they mention
    “STACK”, one of their partners.  I
    decided to check out STACK, and, so, this post is about STACK.  For those of you who heard about iSqFt years
    ago, the founder of STACK Technologies was one of the co-founders of iSqFt.
    Here’s what STACK is (and it sounds to me
    like STACK (pun intended) well stacks-up against PlanSwift (PlanSwift was
    purchased by Textura Corp, and, later on, Textura was purchased by Oracle.)
     “STACK Construction Technologies has developed
    a collection of on screen takeoff and estimating tools for professional
    contractors. Our software is web based so it’s usable on MAC or PC on any
    browser with nothing to download or install. We give you the latest technology
    available to bid more work in less time from anywhere. All of our software
    solutions provide the same fast, easy to use interface that will help you
    increase bid accuracy and reduce errors.”
    STACK Technologies
    offers:
    STACK Estimating
    STACK Takeoff
    STACK Plan Viewer            
    STACK Catalogs
    You can read more detailed information about
    these products at this link:
    From STACK’s “history” page (which I found
    especially interesting because I had no idea that the people behind STACK were
    co-founders of iSqFt):
    Thanks for
    visiting and welcome to our site. We are dedicated to helping you learn more
    about our exciting new Cloud based technology for working with blueprints on
    screen!
    A little history
    and the story of Buildware, iSqFt.com and STACK Construction Technologies:
    In the mid-1990s
    while working in the construction industry, my son Justin (then only 15) and I
    put together an estimating software program that we called Buildware Pro.
    Originally targeting the commercial roofing industry, Buildware Pro allowed you
    to measure paper plans using a digitizer, or even on your computer screen if
    you had a digital PDF or TIF file. We enjoyed success from the very beginning
    and by the time Justin was 17 we had sold 1/2 a million dollars’ worth of our
    construction software!
    Measuring on
    screen led me to a new idea… one where GCs could distribute plans in digital
    form to their subs and suppliers, via the Internet. During the same time frame
    my friends Al and Tracy Battle had started the first ever “Internet Plan
    Room” and partnered with the AGC in Atlanta to distribute plans for public
    projects to subs and suppliers in that market. Al, Tracy and I put our
    companies together and iSqFt.com was born.

    Justin, Jane
    Baysore and I left iSqFt.com a few years back with the idea of making plans
    easier than ever to work with on screen and Cloud Takeoff was born.
    We’re very proud
    to announce the next evolution of our company STACK Construction Technologies,
    which includes STACK Takeoff, STACK Estimating, and STACK Plan Viewer.
    STACK brings
    together the very latest in web technologies to deliver a powerful yet
    surprisingly easy to use, web based software as a service solution. We believe
    that STACK will transform the way the construction industry works, estimates
    and collaborates using digital plans. It is our mission to continue to improve,
    integrate with more and more plan rooms and to infuse STACK with additional
    sources of real time data for the benefit of all industry participants.
          
    Here’s a bit more history – from
    an article that was published in the Cincinnati Business Courier back in July 2015:
    “Here’s how a
    Cincinnati contractor became CEO of a fast-growing tech startup”
    As the old
    saying goes, if at first you don’t succeed, try, try again and eventually
    you’ll be the CEO of a fast-growing tech company that doubles its revenue and
    employees from year to year.
    Okay, maybe that’s not exactly how the saying goes, but it worked for Phil Ogilby.
    Ogilby pioneered
    software that allows contractors to use digital blueprints to estimate the cost
    of a project and the amount of materials they’ll need. This enables users to
    save time and provide better pricing quotes.
    As in any
    industry, however, Ogilby’s technology moved faster than investors and clients,
    and it took hundreds of “no’s” for him to get to where he is today at the plush
    Mason office where his current company, STACK Construction Technology, is
    based.
    “It’s not for
    the meek,” he told me. “There was one point where I made 20 different visits to
    major cities to pitch to venture capitalists, and each one told me no.”
    Ogilby’s
    entrepreneurial journey began in 1995 when he brought home his first personal
    computer. At the time, he was in the commercial roofing business, and he began
    using a spreadsheet program to estimate the cost of projects.
    One day, Ogilby
    came home to find his 14-year-old son, Justin, playing a simple computer game
    he had created using code. That gave Ogilby an idea: What if he and his son
    could write a program that made estimating easier? So they went to the library
    and checked out all of the computer programming books they could find.
    Three years
    later, they succeeded in creating a program they called Buildware Pro, which
    allowed contractors to measure blueprints electronically. They made more than
    $500,000 on the program during the next few years.
    In 1999, Ogilby
    decided to partner with Al and Tracy Battle, the creators of the first
    Internet plan room, to start iSqFt, an industry information provider
    that sells project bidding news. Ogilby traveled around the country pitching
    the idea for the new company but was rejected at every turn.
    “Everybody loved
    it, but nobody invested,” Ogilby said.
    Finally, a Blue
    Ash real estate investor gave the team $500,000 in 2000 to get the business up
    and running. The next year, Ogilby brought on local business development expert
    Dave Conway, and the two raised the
    company’s first round of venture capital from Chrysalis Ventures and River
    Cities Capital Funds. Soon, they had large contractors like Messer Construction
    using their product across the country.
    Ogilby and his
    son left iSqFt in 2008, but the company has
    continued its success. It merged with Chicago-based BidClerk in 2014
    and was sold last December to Genstar Capital. iSqFt currently employs 550 at
    its office in Blue Ash and was approved in June for a 65 percent, six-year job
    creation tax credit. The company is considering moving its headquarters out of
    Cincinnati
    .
    It took Ogilby
    and his son two years to develop the platform for their new business, but in
    2010, they launched Cloud Takeoff, which offers a suite of
    measuring and estimating tools that allow contractors to bid and collaborate
    using digital blueprints. This design is a “return to roots” for him and his
    son, Ogilby said, since the first program they ever created performed similar
    tasks. They changed the product’s name in December from Cloud Takeoff to STACK.
    Ogilby, his wife
    Jane Baysore and his son were the sole
    employees at STACK until 2013, when an expanding customer base called for
    hiring and another round of fundraising. CincyTech, a seed-stage tech company
    investor, helped the team raise $1 million. STACK raised another $1 million in
    private investment last year and received a $1 million loan from the state of
    Ohio.

    STACK went from
    three employees in 2013 to 25 this year, and Ogilby said that number will
    double in the next year as the company hires more software engineers and
    support positions. The company’s revenue also doubled from 2013 to 2014.
    STACK is
    currently in talks with several major manufacturers about integrating their
    products into the company’s software. This would enable contractors not only to
    view the amount of materials needed for a project but to order those materials
    with the click of a button.
    It would also
    solve a lot of issues for manufacturers, who struggle to reach their ultimate
    customers. Currently, the best manufacturers can do is buy a lead, which tells
    them which subcontractors are working on a given project, and then attempt to
    contact those subcontractors.
    STACK also is
    launching a new service called STACK To-Go for clients who are crunched for
    time and need their estimating performed by a third party.

    Even after
    founding three successful construction technology companies and forging a
    career in software development, Ogilby still considers himself a construction man
    first and foremost.

    0
    0
    1
    1450
    8267
    Proactive Management
    68
    19
    9698
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    “I really see myself still as a contractor,” he said.
  • Reprographers, if you are offering
    web-based planroom services (and most reprographers are), how does your service
    stack up against the services offered by companies (like SmartBidNet) who offer
    online planroom services as a part of
    an extensive offering of other construction-project bid management services?
    Evidently, SmartBidNet did not
    develop the web-based planroom service it offers with a SmartBidNet
    subscription; evidently, SmartBidNet uses the web-based planroom service
    developed the “Virtual Plan Room Network.” 
    Evidently, the Virtual Plan Room Network is widely used by Builders
    Exchanges in many parts of the U.S.
    Here’s some information about
    SmartBidNet:
    “ONLINE CONSTRUCTION BID SOFTWARE
    FOR COMMERCIAL GENERAL CONTRACTORS”
    Annual Standard License Includes:
    Subcontractor Database Management.
    Prequalification with ConsensusDocs®
    721.
    Online Plan Room with Unlimited
    Projects, Invitations to Bid, Files, Email Communications, and Custom Reports.
    Subcontractor and Supplier Search
    via the SmartInsight Contractor Network and Public Agency Database Integration.
    Bid Solicitation Tracking for
    Identifying which Subcontractors are Viewing and Downloading Plans.
    Custom Form Builder for Requesting
    Prequal, Financial and Other Sub Information.
    BidTabs for Comparing Subcontractor
    Bid Submissions Side by Side.
    Integration with Company Website for
    Subcontractor Registration and Public Project Lists.
    Full API Access to Integrate Your
    System Data with Your Other Software.
    Mobile App for iOS and Android.
    Personalized User Interface with
    Customizable Dashboard.
    An excerpt from the “Case Study” interview of
    Seth Cheever of Stiles Construction:
    How has your company’s use of technology evolved since you
    first started working there?
    In the last 12 years, we have gone from manual takeoffs
    with rulers and a digitizer to using computer based on-screen takeoffs that are
    able to be collaborated on by the entire department. We have also changed our
    bid solicitation system from isolated components (i.e. fax machines, a
    complicated subcontractor database directory, and untraceable paper plan
    deliveries) to SmartBid, which simplifies all of those individual processes and
    components into a unified platform. Of course BIM has moved to the front of the
    line of construction technology evolution.
    We’ve gone from blueprints, to plotted drawings, to on-screen 2D
    images to 3D models.
    We’re now getting into 4D simulations and 5D model-based
    cost estimating.
    Link
    to full Stiles Interview:
    A couple of excerpts from the “Case Study”
    interview of David Green of Swinerton Builders:



    How has your company’s use of
    software solutions evolved since you first started working there?



    Swinerton has always been ahead
    of the curve on adoption of technology. When I first started with Swinerton 16
    years ago we were using a Swinerton developed construction management and
    accounting software that was accessible to the field via modem, P3 scheduling
    software and Lotus 123 customized spreadsheet solutions for estimating. This
    evolution has continued with early adoption of web-based invitation to bid
    systems and web-based document distribution.

    Currently, Swinerton is a
    leader in the adoption of BIM 3D, 4D and 5D solutions.
    Our most recent push is to bring these technologies into the field
    with paperless offices, using tablet-based project management/monitoring tools.
    We are again an
    early adopter of cloud-based BIM software and collaboration as well.



    Over the next decade, in what
    ways do you hope to see construction technology evolve?



    We would like to see integrated
    applications that can freely exchange data.
    We would like the
    ability to delete all paper
    and migrate pricing/bidding online as well.


    Link
    to full Swinerton Builders Interview:
    Link
    to SmartBidNet web-site:
    SmartBidNet Enters Partnership With Virtual Planroom Network
    Link to the
    announcement above that was published in May 2016:

    0
    0
    1
    665
    3793
    Proactive Management
    31
    8
    4450
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • It is not common for reprographers to publish
    pricing on their web-sites.
    That said, there are a couple of
    “Internet-based” reprographers (plans4less.com and blueprintsprinting.com) that
    do.  And LDIReproprinting, a chain of franchised
    reprographics shops in the southeastern U.S., has always published its pricing
    on its web-site.
    Pricing for printing A/E plans may not be
    transparent industry-wide, but, even if it was (even if most reprographers
    published their prices on their web-sites), I seriously doubt that there would
    be any consistency in pricing.
    And, as to the prices shown in the tables, I
    have three comments:
    –These prices are quite a bit less than
    Staples charges. But, who cares about Staples; Staples is really a non-factor
    in the A/E/C reprographics marketplace.

    –Based on pricing I observed in government-sector bids the past few years, the
    prices these reprographers are offering aren’t inexpensive prices.  I’ve seen prices that are a LOT less.  For example, the City of Boston still pays
    less than $.24 per print for large-format b/w prints.
    –Now that HP PageWide XL units are out in
    the market, I’ve been expecting to find reprographers who are charging no
    premium or a small-premium for printing plans in color (vs. in b/w.)  If that hasn’t yet happened in your market,
    do expect it to show up at some point down the road.  I think that’s inevitable.
    Prices “per print” per pricing posted on
    their respective web-sites
    Notes for tables:
    –LDI’s
    pricing web-page does not show pricing for 15×21 prints, so I’ve estimated that
    pricing
    –LDI’s
    pricing for b/w prints based on orders for
    300 or more prints per order
    (b/w)
    –LDI’s
    pricing for color prints based on orders for
    30 or more prints per order
    (color)
    –Plans4less
    pricing web-page does not show pricing for 12×18 prints (b/w or color)
    Black & White
    Plans4less.com
    Blueprintsprinting.com
    Ldireproprinting.com
    12×18
    .50
    .11
    .44
    15×21
    .50
    .33
      
    (estimated)       .55
    18×24
    .50
    .41
    .67
    24×36
    1.00
    .66
    .90
    30×42
    1.00
    .99
    1.35
    36×48
    1.00
    1.32
    2.05

    0
    0
    1
    342
    1956
    Proactive Management
    16
    4
    2294
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}
    table.MsoTableGrid
    {mso-style-name:”Table Grid”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-priority:59;
    mso-style-unhide:no;
    border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;
    mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-border-insideh:.5pt solid windowtext;
    mso-border-insidev:.5pt solid windowtext;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

    Color
    Plans4less.com
    Blueprintsprinting.com
    Ldireproprinting.com
    12×18
    6.85
    .40
    .90
    15×21
                            6.85                   
    1.65
    (estimated)     1.35
    18×24
    6.85
    2.06
    1.80
    24×36
    14.00
    3.30
    3.60
    30×42
    20.00
    4.95
    5.40
    36×48
    28.00
    6.60
    7.20
  • Link to article on Procore.com:

    0
    0
    1
    41
    238
    Proactive Management
    1
    1
    278
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  •  Yesterday,
    I had a conversation on the phone with a guy whose company has developed two
    different (but related) products – one of those products is a cloud-based
    document management service for A/E/C drawings – the other product is an
    electronic display device (so, hardware) for displaying A/E/C drawings (and it
    can be used to project drawings on a screen or wall.)
    ARC
    sells SmartScreens.
    Kevin
    Rowe’s iPlanTables business sells giant display screens.
    What
    are YOU offering?
    When
    I asked the guy I talked to if he’d reached out to the reprographer community,
    he (essentially) said, “no, we don’t think they would like our electronic display
    product because it would hurt their printing business.”
    My
    response to him is that, if A/E/C customers want to find ways to reduce
    large-format A/E/C printing, they will do that, despite what reprographers may
    feel about that. The transition from “printing everything” to “printing less”
    isn’t in the hands of reprographers, and, if reprographers want to continue in
    business, continue serving the imaging and document management needs of the
    A/E/C community, they will be wise to find solutions that will assist their
    A/E/C customers find solutions those customers are interested in (and want to
    find) rather than trying to fight the transition.  The transition to the “print less” world is
    inevitable.
    Read
    this stuff:       

    0
    0
    1
    296
    1692
    Proactive Management
    14
    3
    1985
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}

  • The American Institute of Architects (AIA) reported the
    August ABI score was 49.7, down from the mark of 51.5 in the previous month
    .
    This score reflects a decrease in design services (any score above 50 indicates
    an increase in billings). The new projects inquiry index was 61.8, up sharply
    from a reading of 57.5 the previous month.
    Read the complete note at this link:

    0
    0
    1
    82
    468
    Proactive Management
    3
    1
    549
    14.0

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    JA
    X-NONE

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-language:JA;}