On January
18th, Memjet filed (with the court) its answer to HP’s counterclaim,
and, within the answer, Memjet basically denied all of HP’s counterclaims. In the answer document, Memjet requested a
trial by jury.
18th, Memjet filed (with the court) its answer to HP’s counterclaim,
and, within the answer, Memjet basically denied all of HP’s counterclaims. In the answer document, Memjet requested a
trial by jury.
0
0
1
67
387
Proactive Management
3
1
453
14.0
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
JA
X-NONE
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Cambria;
mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-language:JA;}
If this case
does go to a jury, I’m positive that jurors will have an “interesting time”
trying to understand Memjet’s and HP’s claims and counterclaims and the
differences between Memjet’s and HP’s patents.
I’d love to be on that jury!
does go to a jury, I’m positive that jurors will have an “interesting time”
trying to understand Memjet’s and HP’s claims and counterclaims and the
differences between Memjet’s and HP’s patents.
I’d love to be on that jury!
Leave a comment